commit 064254e6a183a0ae331dc7ce06fb89146c67fccd
parent 62a00aa9547353e45fd67fa018045ccc34bac4c2
Author: Daniel Gultsch <daniel@gultsch.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:02:26 +0200
removed 'Push (on server)' test as prosody fixed the bug
Diffstat:
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/eu/siacs/compliance/suites/Conversations.java b/src/main/java/eu/siacs/compliance/suites/Conversations.java
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ public class Conversations extends AdvancedServerIM {
CSI.class,
HttpUpload.class,
Proxy65.class,
- PushOnServer.class
+ Push.class
).stream()).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
diff --git a/src/main/java/eu/siacs/compliance/tests/PushOnServer.java b/src/main/java/eu/siacs/compliance/tests/PushOnServer.java
@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-package eu.siacs.compliance.tests;
-
-import rocks.xmpp.core.session.XmppClient;
-
-import java.util.Arrays;
-import java.util.List;
-
-/**
- * This test checks for availability of push on the server jid
- * The XEP specifics that the availability should be announced on the account
- * Prosody (the only implementation for now) does this the wrong way round
- * see Test 'Push' for a proper test
- */
-public class PushOnServer extends AbstractDiscoTest {
-
- public PushOnServer(XmppClient client) {
- super(client);
- }
-
- @Override
- List<String> getNamespaces() {
- return Arrays.asList("urn:xmpp:push:0");
- }
-
- @Override
- boolean checkOnServer() {
- return true;
- }
-
-
- @Override
- public String getName() {
- return "XEP-0357: Push Notifications (on server)";
- }
-}